Submissions/Editor surveys: Taking the pulse of the community
|
This is an accepted submission for Wikimania 2013. |
|
Presentation Media
|
- Submission no.
- 4017
- Subject no.
- E2
- Title of the submission
- Type of submission
- presentation
- Author of the submission
- Tilman Bayer
- Country of origin
- Germany (living in the US)
- Affiliation
- Wikimedia Foundation (Senior Operations Analyst)
- E-mail address
- tbayer
wikimedia.org
- Username
- Tbayer
- Personal homepage or blog
- Abstract
- This presentation will highlight some of the results of the 2012 editor survey, which was the largest conducted by the Wikimedia Foundation so far. E.g.: A detailed picture of the community's satisfaction with the work of the Foundation in various areas, data on editor experiences including over 8000 respondents describing in their own words their most important motivation to contribute (analyzed quantitatively), and demographic statistics, compared with the previous two WMF-run editor surveys. If time permits, I will include a more general look at online editor surveys and their methodological issues, and discuss ongoing and future work.
- Detailed proposal
- The 2010-15 strategic plan envisages the Foundation conducting regular surveys "to take the pulse of the community and identify pressing issues or concerns". Besides these general editor surveys, smaller surveys have come to be used more frequently by the Foundation and others to gauge the views of Wikimedians on more specialized topics. In particular, they can give a voice to those who are less inclined to participate in public discussions on the wikis and mailing lists.
Somewhat comparable to the presentation about the first WMF-run editor survey at Wikimania 2011, this presentation will first highlight some of the results of the 2012 editor survey, which was the largest conducted by the Wikimedia Foundation so far. E.g.: A detailed picture of the community's satisfaction with the work of the Foundation in various areas, data on editor experiences including over 8000 respondents describing in their own words their most important motivation to contribute (analyzed quantitatively), and demographic statistics such as gender, compared with the previous two WMF-run editor surveys. If time permits, I will include a more general look at online editor surveys and their methodological issues, and discuss ongoing and future work. Depending on the audience, this could also touch more technical topics such as the choice of survey platform/software, reporting and analysis tools, and privacy topics.
- Track
- Analysis and Public Engagement
- Length of presentation/talk
- Can be adjusted, 15-25 minutes
- Language of presentation/talk
- English
- Will you attend Wikimania if your submission is not accepted?
- Yes
- Slides or further information (optional)
- Special requests
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).
- Sharihareswara (WMF) (talk) 01:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- CT Cooper · talk 19:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Aegis Maelstrom (talk) 14:37, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Definitely I need to see your outcome. Regardless of accepting your submission, would you be that kind to summarize and publish your results with your interpretation?
- Graham87 (talk) 11:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ocaasi (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ocastro (talk)
- Denis Barthel (WMDE) (talk)
- Vera (talk) 20:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Manuel (WMDE) (talk) 08:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- Add your username here.
- Roblespepe (talk) 22:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC) (Argentina)
- Jensbest (talk) 03:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)